Re: UFS not 64-bit clean?
Re: UFS not 64-bit clean?
- Subject: Re: UFS not 64-bit clean?
- From: Chris Bednar <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:49:13 -0600 (CST)
>
> Hmmm, also.... please don't ask me why I did this:
>
>
>
>> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
>
>> #endif /* REV_ENDIAN_FS */
>
>>
>
>> brelse(bp);
>
>> - return (EIO); /* XXX needs translation */
>
>> + /*return (EIO); XXX needs translation */
>
>
>
>
>
>
I wonder why it did not panic later when you brelse(bp) the same buffer
>
again....
>
>
386 brelse(bp);
Well, please note that, although I can't think of any reason
I would have commented out the return there (well, OK; the reason
had something to do with 2am, I guess), it has nothing to do with
the panic. Aside from the fact that the conditions at line 361
are not met, I don't see any reason ffs_reload() would be getting
called here...
----
Chris J. Bednar
Director, Distributed Computing Product Group
http://AdvancedDataSolutions.com/