Re: installing a new kernel broke carbon
Re: installing a new kernel broke carbon
- Subject: Re: installing a new kernel broke carbon
- From: Jim Magee <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:07:02 -0400
It sounds to me like he installed the "less functional" Darwin version
of CoreFoundation, and Mac OS X wants, no needs, the full version.
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:03 PM, Louis Gerbarg wrote:
Well, what I was thinking was that if he followed some of the more
common build instructions he would have not just replaced the kernel,
but also the System, IOKit, and Kernel frameworks. If he then reverted
by simply copying the old kernel he might have a kernel/library
mismatch.
Louis
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 05:26 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 05:02 PM, Louis Gerbarg wrote:
It depends, how did you build and install it, and what version did
you build.
I don't get the fact that rebooting with the old kernel still gives
you the same problem. Did something else change at the same time?
Regards,
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large *
Institute for General Semantics | When LuteFisk is outlawed
| Only outlaws will have
| LuteFisk
*--------------------------------------*-------------------------------*
-
-
_______________________________________________
darwin-kernel mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
darwin-kernel mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
darwin-kernel mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.