Re: What should we do when headers are missing in 10.2?
Re: What should we do when headers are missing in 10.2?
- Subject: Re: What should we do when headers are missing in 10.2?
- From: "Justin C. Walker" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:41:25 -0700
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 08:49 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Jim Magee writes:
That's just the way BSD headers do things. To change it would break
BSD [in-kernel] compatibility. But having BSD [in-kernel]
compatibility also implies something else. As you will see, the
definition of struct ipovly [the type for the ti_i field] is marked
__APPLE_API_PRIVATE. That's you indicator that you have to be prepared
to have your software track the OS on a release-for-release basis.
I see your point, but ipovly is not a good example. Unless you're
planning to reimpliment IP so that you can't talk to anybody else, I
doubt that ipovly will be changing much ;)
I think 'ipovly' is an implementation-specific thing, and does not
affect wire content.
Regards,
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large *
Institute for General Semantics | If you're not confused,
| You're not paying attention
*--------------------------------------*-------------------------------*
_______________________________________________
darwin-kernel mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.