Re: Q: Darwin panicing too soon?
Re: Q: Darwin panicing too soon?
- Subject: Re: Q: Darwin panicing too soon?
- From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:43:21 +0200
On woensdag, aug 6, 2003, at 16:12 Europe/Brussels, Jim Magee wrote:
[1]. The i386 kernel still maps the kernel as part of each task, so
it's kernel virtual space is still much smaller (and the application's
available virtual space is also smaller). The PowerPC kernel has
separate 4GB address spaces for the kernel vs. each application.
Are there more juicy tidbits like this you can share with the list? The
Unix section on Panther at apple.com isn't exactly all-telling :) Also,
the WWDC sessions at connect.apple.com (which I can't watch yet as
student member, but I can see the titles already) on the Core OS don't
seem to include any kernel architectural improvement sessions. And is
there maybe a technote about this kind of stuff planned? (a bit like
<
http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2002/tn2053.html> on Mac OS X
10.2)
Jonas
_______________________________________________
darwin-kernel mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.