Re: Next VFS KPI ?
Re: Next VFS KPI ?
- Subject: Re: Next VFS KPI ?
- From: Quinn <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:27:21 +0100
At 2:11 -0500 1/8/05, Brian Bergstrand wrote:
The app I'm testing is TextEdit, and using fs_usuage, I can see
exchangedata is returning 45 (ENOTSUP) when trying to save a
modified file. SMBFS works fine though. So I'm guessing something is
wrong in our vol caps.
Last I checked, TextEdit doesn't actually check whether exchangedata
is supported. It just calls it, and if that fails it falls back to
its alternative algorithm. Looking at TextEdit with fs_usage on
Tiger, that's exactly what I see: exchangedata returns 45 (ENOTSUP)
and then TextEdit continues on its merry way.
So, if TextEdit's saving is failing, it's not because of your volume
capabilities, it's because of some part of its alternative algorithm
is failing.
S+E
--
Quinn "The Eskimo!" <http://www.apple.com/developer/>
Apple Developer Technical Support * Networking, Communications, Hardware
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden