Re: xnu-792.1.5 leaner than Mac OS X 10.4.1
Re: xnu-792.1.5 leaner than Mac OS X 10.4.1
- Subject: Re: xnu-792.1.5 leaner than Mac OS X 10.4.1
- From: Kevin Van Vechten <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:29:06 -0700
Obviously there's a difference that prompted you to ask if you could
build the "full" version in the first place. My response is true, and
I know because I post the source code archives.
- Kevin
On Jun 2, 2005, at 10:45 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
Is this true? I never knew that XNU was different between the
editions. I do know that many kexts are binary only. Is this
speculation or knowledge? Do you have references...
JP
On 2 Jun 2005, at 12:52, Kevin Van Vechten wrote:
No, it is not possible. Apple does not release the entire source
code of the mach_kernel. However, there is rarely any practical
difference, and I haven't personally encountered any problems using a
Darwin kernel on Mac OS X.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden