Re: kmem_alloc replacement in Tiger
Re: kmem_alloc replacement in Tiger
- Subject: Re: kmem_alloc replacement in Tiger
- From: Mike Smith <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:59:10 -0800
On Feb 2, 2006, at 5:26 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
So I'm worried that on a DART-less system, there is no way to get a
DMA address for a physical address over 4GB that does not involve
bounce pages. I'm hoping that I'm wrong (like the bouncer is a
gIOSystemMapper; that would only waste memory..).
Drew,
Sadly, any concrete discussion on this subject involves speculation
about future products; unless Dean Reece has something to say about a
possible '64-bit I/O Kit' it's going to have to sit and wait for a bit.
= Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden