Re: Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.?
Re: Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.?
- Subject: Re: Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.?
- From: "Shawn Erickson" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:34:15 -0700
On 10/27/06, Rick Mann <email@hidden> wrote:
Coming from over a decade of Mac OS development, I'm less and less
impressed with the overall design of Unix/Darwin APIs and code. This
is very frustrating.
The computing model of Darwin (and Unix) is far richer then what we
had in Mac OS, as a result assumption that held true in Mac OS do not
hold true in Mac OS X.
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
References: | |
| >thread_t, uthread_t, at al.? (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.? (From: Michael Smith <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.? (From: plumber Idraulico <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.? (From: "Shawn Erickson" <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.? (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.? (From: Michael Smith <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.? (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>) |