Re: mbuf_pullup practically useless
Re: mbuf_pullup practically useless
- Subject: Re: mbuf_pullup practically useless
- From: Stephane Sudre <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:57:58 +0200
On 26 août 07, at 23:19, Platon Fomichev wrote:
Hello Everyone
[...]
Also I am interested in smth. like this - if for example I will write
such a routines - can I submit them to Apple?
This is more a rhetorical question than anything else. There is no law
preventing you from submitting it. So, yes you can.
If they will accept them will they appear in next OS release or at
some fix level?
Honestly, whether they use your code or their code (that would assume
it's not part of 10.5 already which I don't know and wouldn't be able
to tell anyway):
- probability it will be part of Mac OS X 10.4.x (with x>=10): 0%
- probability it will be part of Mac OS X 10.5.0: 0.0000000000000001%
- probability it will be part of Mac OS X 10.5.x (with x>0): 10%
- probability it will be part of Mac OS X 10.6: 50%
- probability it will be included when we reach the 3rd millenium: 70%
So in the meantime, it's obvious you will need to add this improved
version of mbuff_pullup to your kernel extension if you want to benefit
from it.
N.B: with the exceptions of the first 2 probabilities, YMMV.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden