Re: mbuf_pullup practically useless
Re: mbuf_pullup practically useless
- Subject: Re: mbuf_pullup practically useless
- From: Platon Fomichev <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:38:05 +0400
Howdy-ho
Thanks for cheering me up but can you point me to the exact func -
most of them say in rather 'capital letters' that I should not block
while executing them. And only send/receive funcs allow swallowing..
Best regards,
Stauff__
On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Stéphane Sudre wrote:
On Aug 30, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Platon Fomichev wrote:
[...]
Btw not everything is easy as it seems... For example one of my
tasks while developing an NKE (at socket level) was to delay
connect() call until user land processes signals that it's ok -
rather trivial task as I think - but nope connect() can't be
blocked as it is in data path - I can't swallow connect() call and
it seems that there is no way I can solve this on Socket NKE level...
This can be done at the socket level AFAIK.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40alarity.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden