• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Leopard Sources?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Leopard Sources?


  • Subject: Re: Leopard Sources?
  • From: Chuck Remes <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:14:19 -0500


On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Chuck Remes wrote:


My recollection of the number of kernel patches discussed on the lists (darwin-dev, darwin-kernel and darwin-drivers) and submitted the last several years is... near zero. I agree there is a lot of irrational love for OSX by a lot of folks, but few of them are kernel hackers. Most of the folks who love OSX love it for the GUI and userland apps.


The number of people really interested in the UNIX pieces of OSX couldn't even keep *one* darwin "distro" alive. Where's the love?

Anyway, way off topic for the list. I just had to add to the noise... :-)

I can't resist at least one more comment.

If Andreas wants to add SCTP support to the kernel, I have a proposal. When the leopard sources appear (in a few days, weeks or months), do the hard work to create the KPI infrastructure you need to support this protocol. Write the code, create tests if possible along with a test harness (hard work for kernel code), plus documentation and submit it to Apple as a patch. Publish this patch far and wide, take feedback from other interested kernel hackers and *maintain* the patch as new Leopard releases ship. Make it your mission to get the patch accepted in 10.5.x or whatever the next major release is in 20 months.

Don't wait for Apple to do this work for you (once you have the sources). Do the work, create the patch and be its champion.

I think Apple folks would be surprised. Thus far the level of "community" support for kernel patches barely rises above *apathy*. Anyone who created a kernel patch and tried to support it this way would probably garner some sub-rosa engineering support within Apple simply because they'd be impressed with the effort.

cr
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Leopard Sources?
      • From: Andreas Fink <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Leopard Sources? (From: Andreas Fink <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Shaun Wexler <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Michael Tuexen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Michael Smith <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: William Kucharski <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Quinn <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Andrew Gallatin <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Chuck Remes <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Leopard Sources?
  • Next by Date: Re: Leopard Sources?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Leopard Sources?
  • Next by thread: Re: Leopard Sources?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread