Re: Rosetta and Code Injection
Re: Rosetta and Code Injection
- Subject: Re: Rosetta and Code Injection
- From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:19:25 -0700
We support a legitimate way of function hooking:
man dyld
If you need it at runtime, Objective C supports that too.
-- Terry
On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Matt Burnett wrote:
I all ready had a similar discussion with Terry about this a while
ago.
You guys know that if Apple developed and supported a way of
function hooking, it could include information in crash reports
about what kext/process is hooking a process or the kernel. If your
worried about support costs, how about not supporting a app when it
is being hooked?
On Apr 23, 2008, at 9:24 PM, Terry Lambert wrote:
On Apr 23, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Bob Murphy wrote:
So how does one distinguish the Rosetta process from the PPC
surrogate?
You don't.
Let me put this pretty bluntly... how would you like to be the poor
engineer catching bug reports because Joe Blows thread that he ran
in your address space happened to overwrite something critical
because Joe Blow made a mistake in his code? How much worse would
this be if someone were giving out cookbooks to people who
otherwise were beginning coders?
Now ask yourself again why this is unsupported...
-- Terry
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden