Re: improving the Seatbelt system
Re: improving the Seatbelt system
- Subject: Re: improving the Seatbelt system
- From: Chris Adams <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:31:57 -0800
On Jan 26, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Kevin Van Vechten wrote:
Yes, this list is an appropriate forum. I've forwarded this to the
team responsible for sandbox (I'm not sure whether they're
subscribed to this list).
Is there a more appropriate forum? One of the things I've been meaning
to do is file an enhancement request regarding some of the available
features for seatbelt but I think it would be useful to discuss some
of the more complicated scenarios with a fairly wide developer audience.
The main area I'm interested in is dealing with user intent — e.g. it
would be really nice if there was a simple way for an application to
say that it will only use the standard paths (e.g. ~/Library/
{Application Support,Preferences,Cache}/com.example.app.*) and
anything which the user has selected in a standard open/save dialog,
drag-and-drop, etc. which appears to be currently impossible short of
creating a separate process and using IPC.
Chris
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden