• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Set process' working set size explictly
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Set process' working set size explictly


  • Subject: Re: Set process' working set size explictly
  • From: Maxim Zhuravlev <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:05:50 +0300

2009/2/18 Michael Smith <email@hidden>:
>
> By constraining the amount of virtual memory your process uses.
>
> Terry's trying to avoid explaining in detail the differences between
> Darwin's approach to resource allocation (squeaky wheel) and Windows' (no
> you can't have a pony) - the latter is probably where you're coming from.
>
> I would be happy to go into more detail, if you'd like.
>
>  = Mike
>
>

Sure, I'd like.

Thanks in advance,
 - Maxim.
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Set process' working set size explictly (From: Maxim Zhuravlev <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Set process' working set size explictly (From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Set process' working set size explictly (From: Maxim Zhuravlev <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Set process' working set size explictly (From: Michael Smith <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Set process' working set size explictly
  • Next by Date: Are there any API's available for performing cryptographic functions in a kext?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Set process' working set size explictly
  • Next by thread: Are there any API's available for performing cryptographic functions in a kext?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread