Re: Safe Assumptions(?)
Re: Safe Assumptions(?)
- Subject: Re: Safe Assumptions(?)
- From: José Cornado <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:24:01 -0700
In this case: are there any changes to mach_header that let us know the non-standard segments are coming? do they have to provide the specific data types in header files?
2011/11/8 Shantonu Sen
<email@hidden>
No, it's not safe to assume that, especially with custom binaries that create custom segments (which might appear before __TEXT)
On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:40 AM, José Cornado wrote:
Is it safe to assume that after mach_header comes segment_command(page zero) then segment_command(TEXT) or probing as we read the binary is mandatory?
--
José Cornado
--
home:
http://www.efekctive.com
blog:
http://blogging.efekctive.com----------------------
Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again.
Andre Gide
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden
--
José Cornado
--
home:
http://www.efekctive.com
blog:
http://blogging.efekctive.com----------------------
Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again.
Andre Gide
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden