Re: mach_vm_region vs. vm_region_64
Re: mach_vm_region vs. vm_region_64
- Subject: Re: mach_vm_region vs. vm_region_64
- From: "Quinn \"The Eskimo!\"" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:07:55 +0100
On 13 Apr 2012, at 14:54, Gerriet M. Denkmann wrote:
> What is the difference between mach_vm_region() and. vm_region_64() ?
The former takes the address and size in terms of the address space invariant mach_vm_address_t and mach_vm_size_t.
> Which one if more future-proof?
In general I prefer the "mach_" prefixed routines, but it's hard to talk about "future proof" and "Mach APIs" in the same sentence.
Share and Enjoy
--
Quinn "The Eskimo!" <http://www.apple.com/developer/>
Apple Developer Relations, Developer Technical Support, Core OS/Hardware
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden