Re: unable to allocate contiguous memory buffer with the same physical address twice
Re: unable to allocate contiguous memory buffer with the same physical address twice
- Subject: Re: unable to allocate contiguous memory buffer with the same physical address twice
- From: Andrew Gallatin <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:39:01 -0400
I'm just speculating here, but depending on how the allocator
works, cycling through the addresses may be normal and you
may just be eventually getting hit by fragmentation as Shantonu
suggests. Eg, it looks like a leak but isn't.
What happens if you run your test in a tight loop, just
allocating & deallocating? Do you ever see the physical
addresses wrap back around?
Drew
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden