• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
[Fed-Talk] Re: Army AD and Macs: Not??
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fed-Talk] Re: Army AD and Macs: Not??


  • Subject: [Fed-Talk] Re: Army AD and Macs: Not??
  • From: "Monahan, Jim (Contractor)" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:35:55 -0500

Title: Re: Army AD and Macs: Not??

KC>Apple needs to formally engage the CIO-G6s (DoD and Army, for example) and get an official
KC>position and  eliminate the rumors and local interpretations

I think they are trying - On 11/15, in response to my original message about this issue,
Dave Hale (apple.com) said:

"We are meeting with a senior representative from US Army Enterprise System Technical Activity (ESTA) this week to discuss CAC support for Entourage as well as the 2 AD issues - support for NTLMv2 (coming in Tiger) and SMB signing (not planned but based on feedback from customers will be escalated within Apple)."


The really odd part is the several Unix servers here will be allowed to remain connected to the network.  But the Macs will have their wires disconnected.  Go figure.



Jim Monahan
Network Systems Engineer
RSI, Inc, A CIBER Company
Army Training Support Center
mailto:email@hidden

 


-----Original Message-----
From: Clauson, Ken [mailto:email@hidden]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:28 PM
To: 'Shawn Geddis'; Fedtalk List
Subject: RE: [Fed-Talk] Reminder of List Usage

Perhaps we could do some collective support as well, rather than all of us working through these issues individually. For example, once the NTLM authentication issue booted many of us off windows networks, it would have been useful to find specific solutions posted to the list. . .something beyond "AdmitMac is supposed to work". . .

If apple is truly concerned about apple desktops in the DoD community, and is interested in helping growth (or merely maintaining the scant current

presence) then perhaps some solutions could be researched, documented and posted, thus saving us the time of figuring them out individually.

Apple needs to formally engage the CIO-G6s (DoD and Army, for example) and get an official position and  eliminate the rumors and local interpretations. We all know the local DOIMs are not particularly interested in supporting Macs. . .it would help us if we could come to them with solutions that work. . .detailed, proven solutions that save them and us time and energy. If the answer is "use virtual PC for everything" so be it, but let's get an official position.

Ken Clauson
APAC





-----Original Message-----
From: fed-talk-bounces+kenneth.clauson=email@hidden
[mailto:fed-talk-bounces+kenneth.clauson=email@hidden] On Behalf Of Shawn Geddis
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 3:26 PM
To: Fedtalk List
Subject: [Fed-Talk] Reminder of List Usage


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
l

This email sent to email@hidden  _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Prev by Date: RE: [Fed-Talk] Reminder of List Usage
  • Next by Date: [Fed-Talk] FEAPMO Accepts Linux, Mac OS X
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Fed-Talk] RE: Army AD and Macs: Not??
  • Next by thread: RE: [Fed-Talk] RE: Army AD and Macs: Not??
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread