• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X


  • Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X
  • From: "Link, Peter R." <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:03:12 -0700
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X

Let me correct my last statement. I meant to say neither Sophos nor Check Point support SED management. I've stated previously that WinMagic does.


>
> None of the ones listed support management of Seagate self-encrypting drives. As Allan said in another thread, a SED is much faster than any software-encryption application.
>
>
> On Oct 8, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Qureshi, Usman wrote:
>
>> Sophos is another solution.
>>
>> www.BLOCKEDsophos.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: fed-talk-bounces+usman.qureshi=email@hidden
>> [mailto:fed-talk-bounces+usman.qureshi=email@hidden] On Behalf
>> Of James Alcasid
>> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 3:04 PM
>> To: Marcus, Allan B; Fed Talk
>> Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X
>>
>> Another managed solution is Check Point Full Disk Encryption.
>>
>>
>> On 10/8/10 2:53 PM, "Marcus, Allan B" <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> we use WinMagic. PGP doesn't support self encrypting drives, which is much
>>> faster then SW based encryption. Also, PGP uses a reusable recovery
>> password
>>> whcih we found unacceptable.
>>>
>>> Filevault is free, but it's the slowest one out there.Also, FV only
>> encrypts
>>> the home directory, not shared, not /tmp, and not /var. it's a good
>> solution
>>> for a hobbyist, but there's no enterprise management of keys.
>>>
>>> The only two enterprise solutions I'm aware of are PGP and WinMagic.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Allan Marcus
>>> 505-667-5666
>>>
>>> "Fast, cheap, good. Pick two"
>>> -- Project Management mantra
>>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Bryan William Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>> Quick question for the list:
>>>>
>>>> What encryption methods does everyone recommend for OS X.  It seems that
>>>> adding a firmware pass followed by using FileVault should work.  Does
>> Time
>>>> Machine work with FileVault now?
>>>>
>>>> Last time I used my organizations firmware software, it caused an
>> absolutely
>>>> unacceptable decrease in performance (unusable).  This laptop did not
>> have
>>>> any PHI data on it or classified information so I managed to get an
>> exemption
>>>> back then, but they are attempting to force everyone to use encryption
>> now.
>>>> Is anyone using PGP?  How does it perform?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bryan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bryan William Jones, Ph.D.
>>>> email@hidden<mailto:email@hidden>
>>>> http://BLOCKEDprometheus.med.utah.edu/~bwjones/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <ATT00002..txt>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> James Alcasíd ACSP | VeriSolv Technologies
>> Department of Veterans Affairs | Enterprise Infrastructure Engineering
>> 470 L¹Enfant Plaza SW Suite 3100, Washington DC 20024
>> Office (202) 245-4573, Mobile (202) 340-8930
>>
>> Note:
>> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
>> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
>> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost if you are not the intended
>> recipient.  If you receive this message in error, immediately delete it and
>> all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
>> the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
>> distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
>> intended recipient.  Any views expressed in this message are those of the
>> individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
>> is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity.
>>
>> P Save Paper  Do you really need to print this e-mail?
>>
>> 13:3
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>> <smime.p7s><ATT00001..txt>
>
Peter Link
Cyber Security Analyst
Cyber Security Program
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
PO Box 808, L-315
Livermore, CA 94550
email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X
      • From: Wm.Cerniuk <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X (From: "Marcus, Allan B" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X (From: James Alcasid <email@hidden>)
 >RE: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X (From: "Qureshi, Usman" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [Fed-Talk] WinMagic SecureDoc for Mac and Seagate SED
  • Next by Date: [Fed-Talk] Re: Microsoft Office for Mac 2011 Experiences
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X
  • Next by thread: Re: [Fed-Talk] Encryption of OS X
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread