Re: [Fed-Talk] FIPS question
Re: [Fed-Talk] FIPS question
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] FIPS question
- From: "Miller, Timothy J." <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:20:04 +0000
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] FIPS question
I would presume FIPS mode enforcement would be an option pushed by an MDM.
-- T
On 8/30/12 8:19 AM, "William Cerniuk" <email@hidden> wrote:
>Good info!
>
>Wonder how that works on iOS.
>
>Never saw any self check on PGP when it was PGP (vs SEE now) but maybe it
>was just too smooth to notice as PGP.
>
>--
>R/Wm.
>
>
>On Aug 30, 2012, at 9:10 AM, "Miller, Timothy J." <email@hidden>
>wrote:
>
>> On 8/29/12 9:05 AM, "Marcus, Allan B" <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> 1. I also wonder if Mountain Lion is FIPS compliant even when the
>>> Administrator tools are not installed. It appears the administrator
>>>tools
>>> are just a validation of the integrity and logging of the system, but
>>> there is no data to support this claim.
>>
>> Integrity checking is a core requirement of FIPS validation. If a
>> cryptomodule is run without the startup self-check, it is by definition
>> not in FIPS mode.
>>
>> -- T
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden