Re: [Fed-Talk] New Ipad: More or less likely to be allowed for official use?
Re: [Fed-Talk] New Ipad: More or less likely to be allowed for official use?
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] New Ipad: More or less likely to be allowed for official use?
- From: "Blackmon, Jerry L. (GSFC-750.0)[CAELUM RESEARCH CORPORATION]" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:22:55 -0600
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] New Ipad: More or less likely to be allowed for official use?
On 3/8/12 12:22 PM, "Dave Schroeder" <email@hidden> wrote:
>If this weren't Apple, it would have been called something like "iPad 3
>HD 4G LTE", which is exactly what drives ordinary people away. I'm glad
>Apple went this route, and frankly I hope they do the same thing for the
>iPhone.
Hear here. That kerfluffle about the iPhone 4S not being called 5
couldn't possibly have been more ridiculous.
--
Jerry L. Blackmon <email@hidden>
ACES Mac Support
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden