Re: [Fed-Talk] Good App & Organization App Stores
Re: [Fed-Talk] Good App & Organization App Stores
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Good App & Organization App Stores
- From: "Loftin, Kathy (CONTR)" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 11:58:42 -0400
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] Good App & Organization App Stores
I'm pretty sure that is now an option with Good; I just pinged our rep to confirm and, if I am correct, to ask for more details.
Kathy Loftin, PMP
DOE OCIO Tech. Integration and Engineering
301 903 3654
Contractor to the Dept. of Energy
ActioNet, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Pike [mailto:email@hidden]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 11:49 AM
To: Villano, Paul Mr CIV USA TRADOC
Cc: Loftin, Kathy (CONTR); William Cerniuk; Sullivan, Matthew R CIV (US); email@hidden
Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Good App & Organization App Stores
I believe the app store is an enterprise app store via apple. I do not think it's possible to have an app store that is not sponsored by Apple...
If there is I would like to know as well :)
mike
On Oct 2, 2012, at 9:47 AM, Villano, Paul Mr CIV USA TRADOC wrote:
> Kathy We're developing apps and have distributed some Ipads but I
> didn't know it was possible to set up our own "store." Can you give
> me a detailed walkthrough of how you do that using the Good software??
> (Either by responding to the list if there's interest or to me
> personally?)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fed-talk-bounces+paul.villano=email@hidden
> [mailto:fed-talk-bounces+paul.villano=email@hidden] On
> Behalf Of Loftin, Kathy (CONTR)
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 9:07 AM
> To: William Cerniuk
> Cc: email@hidden; Sullivan, Matthew R CIV (US)
> Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] When did Fed-Talk turn into iPhone/iOS Chat
> Box
>
> We're using the Apple Volume Purchasing Program for now (on GFEs).
> If/when we allow BYOD, I imagine we'll probably do the same. The
> Service Desk has an Apple ID they use to load and manage the software.
> With BYOD, we will need to make sure we can delete any
> government-purchased apps (thus freeing up the license for a different user) while not wiping the entire device.
>
> We're using Good as our MDM. It lets us set up our own app store, but
> since we don't have any internally developed apps at this time, we
> aren't using that feature. The Good MDM does let us see all the
> installed apps (even outside of the Good sandbox) and I believe we'll
> be able to use it for the above-mentioned BYOD issue at some point, to
> actually manage them; for now we haven't really explored that.
>
> Just as an FYI, we don't have GFE Androids as yet. Again, if we start
> allowing BYOD, I think we'll end up with quite a few of those.
>
> Kathy Loftin, PMP
> DOE OCIO Tech. Integration and Engineering
> 301 903 3654
> Contractor to the Dept. of Energy
> ActioNet, Inc.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Cerniuk [mailto:email@hidden]
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 8:35 AM
> To: Loftin, Kathy (CONTR)
> Cc: Mike Pike; Joel Esler; Sullivan, Matthew R CIV (US);
> email@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] When did Fed-Talk turn into iPhone/iOS Chat
> Box
>
> Great info, thank you.
>
> How are you handling software? Has the organization figured out an
> efficient way to provide software that the organization needs users to
> have on their BYODs?
>
> --
> R/Wm.
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:32 AM, "Loftin, Kathy (CONTR)"
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> We have about 400 GFE iPads - out of an 8000 customer base in my
> organization. Lots of people are starting to use them instead of
> Blackberries. If we ever start allowing BYOD, I imagine this number will
> grow quite a bit.
>>
>> Kathy Loftin, PMP
>> DOE OCIO Tech. Integration and Engineering
>> 301 903 3654
>> Contractor to the Dept. of Energy
>> ActioNet, Inc.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: fed-talk-bounces+kathy.loftin=email@hidden
>> [mailto:fed-talk-bounces+kathy.loftin=email@hidden] On
>> Behalf Of Mike Pike
>> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 12:03 PM
>> To: Joel Esler
>> Cc: email@hidden; Sullivan, Matthew R CIV (US)
>> Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] When did Fed-Talk turn into iPhone/iOS Chat
>> Box
>>
>> If you keep it to just federal equipment iOS will be almost
>> eliminated
> from discussion and the number of macs shrink exponentially by the month.
>>
>> The list will die.
>>
>> Here is a federal related question:
>>
>> How many people have a government provided iOS device? I have an iOS
> device on government networks but its personally owned.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone 5
>>
>> On Sep 28, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Joel Esler <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> If it's outside the charter, then it should stop.
>>>
>>> I know I've been participating in some of it lately, and I'll stop.
> Hopefully people will follow.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Taylor Armstrong
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For what it is worth, I'm 100% in agreement with Matthew.
>>>>
>>>> I'm on multiple mailing lists, forums, etc. This is where I go to
>>>> look for things that apply to the Federal workspace, but at leas
>>>> 1/2 the traffic in recent months seems to be little different from
>>>> the traffic on any number of Apple user forums.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, we all need to see/discuss things, but if we're talking about
>>>> our personal equipment, etc., then let's talk about it somewhere else.
>>>> The signal/noise ration in the FedTalk forum has gotten worse
>>>> recently - there are TONS of great resources for general OS X
>>>> and/or iOS discussion, but this is one of, if not the ONLY one that
>>>> should be dealing specifically with Federal .gov implications -
>>>> FISMA, encryption, policies, CIS Benchmarks, etc etc. Wading
>>>> through discussions of personal experiences on non-govermnent owned
>>>> equipment makes it harder to find the relevant topics.
>>>>
>>>> Just my 1/50th of $1...
>>>>
>>>> And yes, I CAN hit delete... but should I have to? Those topics
>>>> are outside of the charter of this list.
>>>>
>>>> Taylor
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Villano, Paul Mr CIV USA TRADOC
>>>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> Exactly, Mr Sullivan. And that is exactly why we need to be
>>>>> discussing these things on the list NOW, before a General Officer
>>>>> sees the shiny new iThingy and says he wants one for official
>>>>> business. These devices and the software they use are "disruptive
>>>>> innovation." It's not enough to wait until they hit the supply
>>>>> chain. We must know BEFORE then. And the only way to tell for
>>>>> ourselves whether the various reports are true or not are to use
>>>>> them ourselves before the General gets one. And the only way we
>>>>> can do that is to use our own personal experiences since the DoD
>>>>> is on the verge of Bring Your Own Device. (Which is best? Why or why not?
>>>>> Which provider has provisos we can't use in DoD? Which is a better
>>>>> vendor? What are the limitations of the software, device,
>>>>> network?)
>>>>>
>>>>> The discussions are important not for the moment for official use
>>>>> but in the very near future as we advise the command and protect
> Soldiers.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: fed-talk-bounces+paul.villano=email@hidden
>>>>> [mailto:fed-talk-bounces+paul.villano=email@hidden]
>>>>> On Behalf Of Sullivan, Matthew R CIV (US)
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 8:40 AM
>>>>> To: email@hidden
>>>>> Subject: [Fed-Talk] When did Fed-Talk turn into iPhone/iOS Chat
>>>>> Box
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't Fed-Talk for actual important information like how to make
>>>>> things work and support each other with Mac, iOS issues where
>>>>> actual FED work is involved. There are hundreds of other more
>>>>> appropriate venues to banter about how awesome or useless the new
>>>>> iPhone is or how awesome or useless the new iOS Maps are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew Sullivan
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>> 4
>>>>> 0
>>>>> noaa.gov
>>>>>
>>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>> m
>>>>
>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> e
>> .gov
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> y.mil
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden