Re: [Fed-Talk] Q1 2013 Mobile Threat Reports
Re: [Fed-Talk] Q1 2013 Mobile Threat Reports
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Q1 2013 Mobile Threat Reports
- From: "Link, Peter R." <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 22:46:49 +0000
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] Q1 2013 Mobile Threat Reports
People used to do that all the time with cars, until they became too complex to fix without specialized tools and they got to the point where they "just ran." Just because someone can modify code doesn't mean they have to. If the application was written correctly
and it satisfies the need, then there's no reason to modify it. Well, unless your a programmer and that's your whole life!
On May 15, 2013, at 3:36 PM, Todd Heberlein < email@hidden> wrote:
Perhaps I should assume that it since it seems that everyone where I work (Air Force Research Lab Information Directorate) that is involved with mobile is focused on
Android, not iOS (I don’t know a single effort involving iOS), it is because it is a greater challenge to employ in the DoD than working with iOS.
Back when I was doing a lot of R&D work for AFRL and DARPA a lot of people were working with and modifying Linux and Snort simply because they *could* modify these platforms. For research, modifiable platforms are great.
Tech transfer could be a problem, however.
Todd
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
Peter Link
Cyber Security Analyst
Cyber Security Program
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
PO Box 808, L-315
Livermore, CA 94551-0808
email@hidden
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden