Re: [Fed-Talk] Fed-talk Digest, Vol 11, Issue 21
Re: [Fed-Talk] Fed-talk Digest, Vol 11, Issue 21
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Fed-talk Digest, Vol 11, Issue 21
- From: JEFFREY COMPTON <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:59:53 -0500
How's that self inflicted?
Was the better choice to allow systems with known vulnerabilities to roam around for 5 months?
Maybe your org is not as security-conscious as my org
I suppose you knew all along updates for 10.7 and 10.8 would be released?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Carlos Velazquez <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Sounds like a sys admin self inflicted wound...
>
>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:04 PM, email@hidden wrote:
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:57:18 -0500
>> From: JEFFREY COMPTON <email@hidden>
>> To: Todd Heberlein <email@hidden>
>> Cc: Fed Talk <email@hidden>
>> Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Snow Leopard security update article
>> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> I can not understand for the life of me why they can’t just spell out their policy. Sometimes I think their primary guiding principle is - “Hmm, how can we make mac enterprise admins look like morons today?” I just got done getting all our users to Mavericks. My answer for “Why do we have to upgrade to Mavericks” was “there are un-patched security vulnerabilities in 10.7 and 10.8." Now - literally days after the deadline our users had to upgrade - Apple releases the patches for 10.7 and 10.8. Thanks Apple.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden