Re: AFP functions 76 and 79
Re: AFP functions 76 and 79
- Subject: Re: AFP functions 76 and 79
- From: Quinn <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:04:46 +0100
At 17:10 -0400 25/4/08, Alex deVries wrote:
How does FPSyncFork differ from the existing FPFlushFork?
In the same way <x-man-page://2/fcntl> F_FULLFSYNC differs from
<x-man-page://2/fsync>. FPFlushFork has traditionally be a fairly
lightweight operation. FPSyncFork is intended to be much more
heavyweight, for use in situations where you absolutely must have the
data committed to persistent storage.
S+E
--
Quinn "The Eskimo!" <http://www.apple.com/developer/>
Apple Developer Relations, Developer Technical Support, Core OS/Hardware
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Filesystem-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden