Re: union mounts not supported?
Re: union mounts not supported?
- Subject: Re: union mounts not supported?
- From: "Quinn \"The Eskimo!\"" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:12:07 +0000
On 1 Nov 2010, at 21:36, Dan Shoop wrote:
> This sounds like it's describing the former union mount rather than the latter unionfs and sounds as if it's saying the "-o union" isn't supported, but you claim it is (and empirically it appears to be as well.)
I think we're talking at cross purposes with regards the definition of "supported". In my case I mean "supported as a long-term binary compatible interface to the system". Under that definition you can't empirically test whether something is supported or not. It sounds like you're using the term "supported" to mean "implemented", which is something entirely different (-:
S+E
--
Quinn "The Eskimo!" <http://www.apple.com/developer/>
Apple Developer Relations, Developer Technical Support, Core OS/Hardware
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Filesystem-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden