readdir vs. getdirentriesattr
readdir vs. getdirentriesattr
- Subject: readdir vs. getdirentriesattr
- From: Sean Farley <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:32:39 -0800
Hello HFS+ devs :-)
I was playing around with trying to speed up the status operation in
mercurial on HFS+ filesystems and heard that getdirentriesattr might be
faster.
From what I could gather (man pages and online resources), it seems the
potential speedup comes from the ability to do a bulk call on the files,
though correct me if I'm wrong.
I posted a proof-of-concept patch here:
http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2014-September/061777.html
But got no real results. Experiments tried included: warm cache vs cold
cache, numbers of files to batch call, and combinations thereof.
Am I missing something obvious or just looking in the wrong place?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Filesystem-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden