Re: Universal Binary and Mac OS X 10.2.8
Re: Universal Binary and Mac OS X 10.2.8
- Subject: Re: Universal Binary and Mac OS X 10.2.8
- From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:25:31 +0100
On samedi, décembre 3, 2005, at 02:10 PM, Adriaan van Os wrote:
Stéphane Sudre wrote:
Stéphane Sudre wrote:
What could be the solution when you're seeing this on OS X 10.2.8?
Update /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Bom.framework ? if that's
possible as a separate update ? and if it helps ?
This can not be a solution :
- changing a Frameworks in /System is a bad idea
- changing a PrivateFrameworks in /System is one of the worst ideas
in the history of bad ideas.
Sorry for trying to be helpful (I won't do that again). You didn't
mention that it was for distribution purposes.
Sorry for omitting this fact. But additionally, to the "theory" of
changing Frameworks (which I confess is rude), there's also the problem
of Frameworks and how they were build. I would tend to believe that the
Frameworks of one OS version are compiled with the latest compiler
version available and that no tweakings are made so that they (the
Frameworks) work on previous OS releases.
For instance, if you copy an OS framework from 10.4 to 10.2, it will
probably not work on 10.2 because the framework was built using gcc 4
which is not (always?) producing code running on 10.2 AFAIK.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden