Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Reading (0x20) and Diet (0x86)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Reading (0x20) and Diet (0x86)

Subject: Reading (0x20) and Diet (0x86)
From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:44:27 +0200

0x20:

The document at http://developer.apple.com/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/ SoftwareDistribution/Concepts/sd_pkg_flags.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/ 20001940 is still missing a lot of space characters in the 4th and later chapters.

Is the 0x20 character that expensive?

0x86:

Stupid question regarding the IFPkgFlagInstallFat flag.

If I have the following application:

toto.app ----- Contents --+-- MacOS      ----- toto
                          |
                          +-- AnotherOS  ----- toto

where toto in MacOS is a FAT mach-o binary for the following architectures:

PPC PPC_750 (you can have specific PPC_750 or 64 bits for instance sections from what I've heard) x86

and I'm installing the application with a package on Mac OS X on a Macintosh G4 with the InstallFat flag off, what is going to be installed?


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



Prev by Date:
Re: How to prevent files overwriting

Next by Date:
using a disk image to install software

Previous by thread:
Re: IFRequirementDicts doesn't work properly from metapkg in Tiger

Next by thread:
using a disk image to install software

Index(es):

Date
Thread