• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Can I refer to files outside of a .pax archive?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Can I refer to files outside of a .pax archive?


  • Subject: Re: Can I refer to files outside of a .pax archive?
  • From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:12:39 +0200


On jeudi, juin 29, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Rick Sustek wrote:

For the simple drag install, I definitely like the popular convention of placing an alias to the /Applications folder right next to the icon of the app itself, and indicating that the user should just drag it over.

Some reasons why this technique is a potential source of problems even when it seems just brilliant:


1. Permissions issue to drop the file(s)

One needs to be user with Admin privileges to do this (unless the permissions have been blown away by previous installations, which is not an uncommon situation in Mac OS X).

So users with no admin accounts will try to drag and drop the file(s) and it won't work. Yet they were instructed to do that.

2. Permissions are blown up if an admin user do this

The owner of the dropped files become the admin user who dropped the file not root as it should be.

It might not be an issue but next time someone runs a Repair Permissions after installing an OS update (as if the problem was not there before the update), he may see that the permissions were incorrect and doesn't remember he just drag and dropped the file.

3. An alias speaks only one language

It might be nice to have an alias of the Applications folder but Applications is not spelled "Applications" in Japanese. So one's potential Japanese customers will wonder what Applications is supposed to mean.

4. Window Background pictures are not localizable

Let's omit the fact that Finder Window Background pictures set on Mac OS X 10.2 and later are not visible on Mac OS X 10.1.

If they are not localizable, then it means you need to make one version for each language you're supporting so that the instructions do not turn into an enigma. The QA team (just in case you're not the QA team too) will thank you for adding more testing cases. Advantage: it solves Point 3.

-----

Based on the different applications installed by drag and drop from a disk image I've seen:

Points 3 and 4: Never taken into account. The application is touted to include a bunch of localization, but the installation procedure is not localized itself.

Point 2: Nobody ever cares.

Point 1: Nobody ever cares. Any OS X user is an admin user, right?

My €0.02
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Can I refer to files outside of a .pax archive? (From: Rick Sustek <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Can I refer to files outside of a .pax archive?
  • Next by Date: Re: Can I refer to files outside of a .pax archive?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Can I refer to files outside of a .pax archive?
  • Next by thread: Re: Can I refer to files outside of a .pax archive?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread