Re: Metapackage that can install depending on architecture
Re: Metapackage that can install depending on architecture
- Subject: Re: Metapackage that can install depending on architecture
- From: Nigel Kersten <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:01:02 -0700
On Mar 26, 2008, at 6:47 AM, Ted Brown wrote:
Some people re-package other companies installers so that they can
easily deploy them. Making a universal binary isn't an option. One
would think Adobe would be able to figure out how to make a
universal binary. But there are still separate installers for the
Flash Player (even though one is called "UB".)
It is odd how Adobe are doing this, but we've tested the UB version on
PPC quite a lot, and have had no problems with it.
This also gets around the horrible Adobe installer that asks for
elevated privileges and then decides not to use them when it scans /
Applications for app bundles that it thinks need updating.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden