• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: OT vs. socket calls on 10.2
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OT vs. socket calls on 10.2


  • Subject: Re: OT vs. socket calls on 10.2
  • From: Andrew Wright <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 18:26:04 +1000

Hi all,

I realise this is a little late since the original bug seems to have disappeared, but I've seen similar behaviour in IE 5.2 (Carbon) on 10.2. FTP transfers get to the point of saying 'entering passive mode' and stop. Not 100% of the time - more like 80%. Simple workaround - open the link in OmniWeb. I'm on 56K dialup. Only started happening in 10.2. The only thought I had is I have the built-in firewall on, but the FTP port disabled - but why then would some apps work and not others? (Cocoa/Carbon?).

Unfortunately I haven't worked out a fix - but thought the info might help someone.

Cheers,
Andrew

On Friday, September 6, 2002, at 03:26 AM, Jim Matthews wrote:

<snip>
Here's a transcript from Fetch 4.0.2; SimpleFTP, Captain FTP and NetFinder all report the same error:

PASV
227 Entering Passive Mode (xxx,1,243,79,17,49)
LIST
550 Could not accept passive data connection - timed out.

This is happening on a customer's machine, so I can't easily monitor packet traffic, but it certainly looks as if Fetch's attempt to establish the data connection isn't leaving the machine. If it was getting out, what would block it (and not similar data connections from the command line client)?

<snip>
_______________________________________________
macnetworkprog mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/macnetworkprog
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: OT vs. socket calls on 10.2 (From: Jim Matthews <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: CFSocket questions
  • Next by Date: OS X Socket Performance
  • Previous by thread: Re: OT vs. socket calls on 10.2
  • Next by thread: Re: OT vs. socket calls on 10.2
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread