Re: Update APBS port mappings
Re: Update APBS port mappings
- Subject: Re: Update APBS port mappings
- From: Joshua Graessley <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:32:16 -0700
I don't know, I haven't tested it. I do know that natd doesn't support
this. Some NATs do support it, some don't. When designing a protocol,
don't count on this working.
-josh
On Oct 2, 2003, at 2:49 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
Are we saying that the APBS NAT software doesn't allow this ???.
>
>
Thanks
>
Mark.
>
>
>
>
> I got a little confused. You've created a mapping from the public ip
>
> address of the NAT box and port 80 to the private IP address of a box
>
> behind the nat on port 80? You're trying to test it by connecting to
>
> the public IP address port 80 from behind the NAT? Most NATs don't
>
> properly implement this. If you try connecting from any address not
>
> behind the NAT, it will probably work. This makes it a nightmare to
>
> try
>
> and get communication working between two devices behind the same NAT,
>
> especially in the case of double NAT where one device may be behind
>
> one
>
> NAT and another device behind two NATS.
>
>
>
> -josh
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
_______________________________________________
macnetworkprog mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/macnetworkprog
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.