Re: Problem in leopard regarding socket shutdown
Re: Problem in leopard regarding socket shutdown
- Subject: Re: Problem in leopard regarding socket shutdown
- From: "Justin C. Walker" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:36:18 -0800
On Dec 28, 2007, at 11:01 , Rob Newberry wrote:
Also, I believe that 'shutdown' implies close (after shutdown,
your descriptor is closed; there is a bit of ambiguity regarding
the two sides of the connection, and when shutdown completes...).
You definitely still need to call "close(2)" on a descriptor after
calling "shutdown(2)".
Thanks for clarifying. I checked the source, and yes: shutdown
(assuming both directions) "closes" the connection but does not free
the descriptor as does close.
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large
Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income
--------
Experience is what you get
when you don't get what you want.
--------
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macnetworkprog mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden