Re: Steams vs Packets
Re: Steams vs Packets
- Subject: Re: Steams vs Packets
- From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:13:08 -0700
On Nov 14, 2010, at 11:38 PM, Gordon Apple wrote:
> I was hoping there was some way I could flush each message through as a single packet so that the receiver would always deal with precisely one message.
Even if it did, you couldn't count on receiving them that way.
--
Scott Ribe
email@hidden
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macnetworkprog mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden