• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut


  • Subject: Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut
  • From: Darrin Cardani <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:34:32 -0700

Jim,

I'll have to think about why you're getting the same texture ID for successive calls, and what you can do about it. There's no real way to tell Motion to give you a different texture ID than the one it decides to give you. But I'm a little surprised that it's giving you the same one when you're not releasing the previous one. (And you better release them all eventually or you'll run out of resources!)

If you want to cache the frames, you could get bitmaps instead of textures and keep them around. However, this will make it more difficult for the host app to cache other things. You'll also have to upload the images to a texture yourself every time you want to use them. But I guess that wouldn't be any slower than having the host app do it. In Motion, we may already be caching the input frames as bitmaps in memory. (If your filter is the only one applied to the footage, then that's already happening.) You probably don't want to do it yourself, though, because if there are other filters applied before yours, and the user changes the parameters of those filters, you have no way to know which frames in your cache have changed and which haven't. So I don't recommend doing that.

One option would be to draw the intermediate steps manually, and feed each output to the next input after it's been rendered. This will reduce performance, of course. Not the best solution, but probably one that can work.

Darrin

On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jim George wrote:

good thinking, I did a print of the texture ID.  In Motion it is
always the same, but in final cut it is always different.

I am not releasing the texture within the loop.  doing so actually
causes a crash.

does anyone have any ideas what to do to ensure that new textures get
allocated each iteration?

On a related note, is there anyway that i can cache these frames into
some sort of LRU expulsion cache.  Most of the time, especially during
render, each frame of out put uses almost the same frames of input but
I am not storing them locally at all.  If i could store them and
reduce the number of calls to temporalImageAPI perhaps that would help
performance?

Thanks!

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Darrin Cardani <email@hidden> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Jim George wrote:

I've run into a discrepancy between the behavior of using Core Image
filters between Final Cut and Motion in an FxPlug and wonder if anyone
would have any insight into the problem.
I have a filter that takes a number of contiguous frames and runs some
processing over them. I am using the temporalImageAPI to get the
frames as FxTextures.
In Final Cut the filter comes out correctly, but in Motion only the
*last* frame gets drawn. I'm thinking somehow that Motion uses a
shared context or texture where final cut allocates new ones, but my
understanding of these under the hood is a bit of guesswork.

Jim,
Yes there are cases where Motion reuses textures. You could check
whether we're giving you the same texture by printing out the texture ID in
the loop. I would think that since you aren't releasing the textures (at
least in the code below) that we wouldn't be reusing the texture ID.
If this is a cut-down version of the code and you actually are
releasing the textures after each loop iteration, that may be the issue. Try
not releasing them until after the draw command. Remember that CI filters
don't actually execute until you call the drawImage: command because they
can concatenate for improved speed, so if you're releasing them in the loop,
they might not be there when the drawing happens.


Below is the basics of what I'm doing in the Render method for FxPlug.

              glPushAttrib(GL_CURRENT_BIT);
              CIContext *ciContext = [CIContext
contextWithCGLContext:CGLGetCurrentContext()


pixelFormat:CGLGetPixelFormat(CGLGetCurrentContext())
options:NULL];
CGColorSpaceRef cspace = CGColorSpaceCreateDeviceRGB();
FxTexture* inputTex;
[temporalImageAPI getInputTexture:&inputTex withInfo:
renderInfo
atTime: renderInfo.frame - width/2];
CIImage* imageBase = [CIImage imageWithTexture: [inputTex
textureId]
size:CGSizeMake([inputTex width],[inputTex height]) flipped:NO
colorSpace:cspace];
UInt32 frameStep = 0;
double i;
for(i = renderInfo.frame - width/2; i <= renderInfo.frame +
width/2; i++){
[_filter setValue:imageBase forKey: @"inputBase"];
[temporalImageAPI getInputTexture:&inputTex
withInfo: renderInfo atTime:i];
CIImage* inputImage = [CIImage
imageWithTexture:[inputTex
textureId] size:CGSizeMake([inputTex width],[inputTex height])
flipped:NO colorSpace:cspace];
[_filter setValue:inputImage forKey:@"inputImage"];
imageBase = [_filter valueForKey:@"outputImage"];
}
[ciContext drawImage:imageBase
inRect:CGRectMake(left,bottom,right-left,top-bottom)
fromRect:CGRectMake(tLeft,tBottom,tRight-tLeft,tTop-tBottom)];
glPopAttrib();


Darrin
--
Darrin Cardani
email@hidden






-- - Jim www.INTelegance.net

-- Darrin Cardani email@hidden


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut
      • From: "Jim George" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut (From: "Jim George" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut (From: Darrin Cardani <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut (From: "Jim George" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut
  • Next by Date: Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut
  • Previous by thread: Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut
  • Next by thread: Re: FxPlug using CIImage with CIFilter behave differently between Motion and Final Cut
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread