Re: 64-bit / 32-bit "mixed"
Re: 64-bit / 32-bit "mixed"
- Subject: Re: 64-bit / 32-bit "mixed"
- From: Garrick Meeker <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:49:36 -0700
When you lipo a universal build, the 32-bit and 64-bit sides can link against different frameworks and compile with different headers. The other architectures are not accessed when loading. I think the only reason to separate them is if you need different plists or resources.
On Jun 29, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Darrin Cardani wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Christoph Vonrhein wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to compile a 32-bit FxPlug that does not to appear in Motion 5?
>
> Interesting question. They shouldn't be showing up already, but it appears they are. Please file a bug on that.
>
>> And also: Is there a way to compile a 64-bit FxPlug that does not appear in Motion 2-4?
>>
>> I don't want to create 32/64 mixed plugins, because I want to take advantage of the new 2.0 features and because of the complications that there are if I want to compile two different FxPlug frameworks into one plugin.
>
> One solution would be to use dynamic registration. When being loaded, you can check the host version number and not return any plug-ins if you're in the wrong host.
>
> Darrin
> --
> Darrin Cardani
> email@hidden
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Pro-apps-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Pro-apps-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden