Re: Direct or Indirect?
Re: Direct or Indirect?
- Subject: Re: Direct or Indirect?
- From: Nick Pilch <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:39:48 -0800
I replaced with WebObjects the back end of a Java application that
talked to a WebLogic server using Java Beans. This makes it a
non-direct-to-Java client app. It does get used in the "WAN" and the
speed is fairly decent. I did have optimize it for this, however, and
watch for speed issues frequently. I load in a bunch of things at a
time to prevent the code from faulting in objects one-by-one. Certain
operations are currently too slow and are being moved to the server
side. I have also experimented with having operations on the server
side controlled by a button on the client side. When the operation is
done, the client is refreshed from the server with the new data.
It was definitely nice to leave the UI intact and only change the
underlying code as a place to start.
WO 5 Java client apps seems to use HTTP/1.1 protocols to communicate
with the server. This makes things a lot better than in WO 4.x where
it used HTTP/1.0 protocols.
--
Nick Pilch / email@hidden
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.