• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [Q] validation and "sticky invalid values"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Q] validation and "sticky invalid values"


  • Subject: Re: [Q] validation and "sticky invalid values"
  • From: email@hidden (Anjo Krank)
  • Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:37:49 +0200
  • Xx-reply-to: email@hidden

Am Donnerstag, 26.06.03 um 22:21 Uhr schrieb Andrew Lindesay:

Hello;

A company I'm working with really wants to have the fields in a component stick around in the case that a validation error occurs. So, for example, some user enters some invalid values into a form that is tied to an EO. Next they submit the values and those fields are correctly validated as being broken. The EO does not actually take up the values (as expected) and hence the unmodified values appear in the response's outputted form again. Is there a "right" way to get those values to get inserted into the EO regardless of their validity or should I find some way to intercept the KVC mechanism at the component level to achieve this? Of course I still need the validation mechanism to run normally to avoid the EC from attempting to persist invalid EO's.

Project Wonder has this functionality. IIRC, then you only override validationFailedWithException() in your component to call eo.setFoo() (which may or may not be a good idea depending on your datatype)


Cheers, Anjo
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >[Q] validation and "sticky invalid values" (From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [Q] validation and "sticky invalid values"
  • Next by Date: Question regarding defaultEditingContext with WebServices
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Q] validation and "sticky invalid values"
  • Next by thread: Re: [Q] validation and "sticky invalid values"
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread