• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO and Java 'packages'?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO and Java 'packages'?


  • Subject: Re: WO and Java 'packages'?
  • From: Chris Pavicich <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:49:51 -0400

JR:

Sorry, I should have clarified that. Our apps and frameworks are in DISTINCT packages. If you move
everything to one package you should be cool.

Sorry, I should have been a bit more clear.

--CMP




On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, at 05:42PM, Jonathan Rochkind <email@hidden> wrote:

>Shoot, that's a pain. I use lots and lots of frameworks, I have lots
>and lots of code. Why don't you need to fully qualify for a component
>in the same app, but you do for one in frameworks? I'm not used to
>having to keep track of which components are in the app and which are
>in frameworks; up to now it's never mattered, so long as the
>component was accessible somehow.  [Not to mention that sometimes the
>pageWithName call is _itself_ in a framework, calling a component in
>that framework or other frameworks].
>
>Wait... did you use a different package name for each framework?  If
>what you're really saying is "You don't have to if they are all in
>the same _package_, but you do if they are in different
>packages"--that makes more sense to me, and is easier to deal
>with---Initially I can just put everythign everywhere, even accross
>multiple frameworks, in the same package.  But that's not quite what
>you said, I'm just making that part up.
>
>?
>--Jonathan
>
>At 5:36 PM -0400 4/21/04, Chris Pavicich wrote:
>>Jonathan:
>>
>>If you are making pageWithName calls to load a page from your app, you
>>should be cool. If you are using them to load pages from a Framework,
>>you will need to use a fully qualified name.
>>
>>The same thing will apply for WOD files. If you are using a component
>>defined in a framework, you need to use the fully qualified name.
>>
>>If you need more help, feel free to contact me off-list, we just went through
>>this same thing not too long ago.
>>
>>HTH
>>--CMP
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Prev by Date: Re: WO and Java 'packages'?
  • Next by Date: Re: WO and Java 'packages'?
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO and Java 'packages'?
  • Next by thread: RE: WO and Java 'packages'?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread