• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO blocking/threading question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO blocking/threading question


  • Subject: Re: WO blocking/threading question
  • From: Hsu <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:52:27 -0700

I've also done some J2EE development recently and in everything I've read on J2EE, performance and memory footprint is always a primary concern. What are other people's thoughts on this matter?

Heh. With any kind of scalable deployment, performance and memory are a concern. I'd be surprised at any framework where it isn't.



What about deploying in a servlet container? The adaptor servlet must be multithreaded as per the servlet specification, but does it forward incoming requests to a single instance of the WO application? Is that configurable somewhere?

See my earlier post. WO advertises itself as a multithreaded servlet (which, by the way, is not required), but once the requests hit WO itself, all of the WO behavior comes into play - if you have WOAllowsConcurrentRequestHandling==false, all request handling will be serialized. If you have WOAllowsConcurrentRequestHandling==true, all request handling will be concurrent. EOF follows the same limitations as a standlone application. Note that it is much easier to setup multiple instances of standalone WO apps, than multiple instances of J2EE containers, generally.


Karl

--

If your face were a tree, it would be different.

Homepage:
     http://homepage.mac.com/khsu/index.html
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WO blocking/threading question
      • From: Michael Parlee <email@hidden>
References: 
 >WO blocking/threading question (From: Michael Engelhart <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO blocking/threading question (From: David Teran <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO blocking/threading question (From: Michael Engelhart <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO blocking/threading question (From: Michael Parlee <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WO blocking/threading question
  • Next by Date: Re: WO blocking/threading question
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO blocking/threading question
  • Next by thread: Re: WO blocking/threading question
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread