Re: Boolean and 5.2.3 my experience
Re: Boolean and 5.2.3 my experience
- Subject: Re: Boolean and 5.2.3 my experience
- From: Robert Walker <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 23:49:04 -0500
Is it not also true that EOModeler is still very relevant to Cocoa-EOF?
This would also explain the need for both Obj-C and Java in EOModler.
On Mar 19, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Mar 19, 2004, at 6:31 AM, Jim Rankin wrote:
On Mar 19, 2004, at 1:28 AM, Greg Hulands wrote:
I don't want to bitch, but I think it is quite poor on Apples part to
still have legacy obj-c naming conventions in there. Since WO has
been
java for a few years now they should have changed NSDecimalNumber to
BigDecimal, NSNumber to Number, etc.
This clearly qualifies as a bug. Should be reported by all of us to
bugreporter.
EOModeler started its life in the Objective-C world. Some still use
it with their earlier Objective-C WO projects. You can display either
Objective-C or Java value classes by choosing whether to display "Value
Class" or "Value Class (Java)" in EOModeler.
So EOModeler continues to work correctly in both Objective-C and Java
worlds. I don't see this as a bug at all.
Aloha,
Art
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type
application/pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
--
Sincerely,
Robert Walker
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.