Re: Performance
Re: Performance
- Subject: Re: Performance
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:05:35 -0800
That works if all they ask for is J2EE. The problem is that they
start reading magazines (nothing scarier than management reading a
technical magazine ;-) and start asking for Hibernate or Struts or
whatever. It is harder sell then.
Chuck
On Nov 4, 2004, at 11:55 AM, Benjamin J Doherty wrote:
On Nov 4, 2004, at 11:55 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
I honestly have to say the more I use WebObjects the more I love it.
Now if only the corps would
stop asking for all that J2EE junk and Apple would promote it just a
wee bit.
if they ask for JBoss, give them JBoss or Websphere or JRun or Tomcat
or WHATEVER. there's nothing that I've encountered so far that isn't
J2EE compliant about WO. you can even convert your EOs into beans...
why on earth you'd want to is beyond me, but if people ask for J2EE
just politely nod and deliver a WebObjects servlet. you just need to
buckle down and learn how to set up JBoss (or whatever) which isn't as
easy as Apple's JavaMonster, but it is definitely more fulfilling.
or am i wrong?
(demonstration coming to a CAWUG meeting in december!)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
village.net
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Practical WebObjects - a book for intermediate WebObjects developers
who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects, or those
who are trying to solve specific application development problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden