• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: OGNL and Wonder
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OGNL and Wonder


  • Subject: Re: OGNL and Wonder
  • From: Benjamin J Doherty <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:35:04 -0500

On Sep 2, 2004, at 2:59 PM, James Cicenia wrote:

Everytime a question / architecture comes up.. the answer is Wonder!

And don't forget that the answer is also WebObjects 5.2.3! (grumble Apple-grumble grumble)


One of these days I will use more than the one method I use from wonder. Mind you it was a nice method.

Wonder looked SO NICE when I was able to use it for my D2JC application... it told me my model was inconsistent! That was helpful... but then 5.2.3 started making a huge sucking sound and throwing null pointer exceptions in the distribution channel.


PS: Maybe it is time for some of us to start creating "Open Source" modules/frameworks instead. The nice thing about PHP is that there are a zillion nice projects. My vote would be for an opensource ACL type system for all new modules to validate against. The problem I see with the php solutions is that combining them is always very hard with regards to user validation, etc.

I'd like to see more widgets for java client. Project Wonder has pretty much nothing on the Java Client side, and I'll be happy to give my stuff away once I get anything useful together. The basic EOWidgets are fine for most functions, but I'd like some JRadioButtons as well as the gold mine of Swing widgets (I saw a nice date selector today) that already exist work themselves into subclasses of EOWidgetController. The example on page 268 of the Desktop Apps book supplied by Apple is obviously pulled out of someone's arse, because the example there fails to compile.


Right now my "problem" is to make a friendlier widget for a Sex attribute. It's a one character field, and the user enters M or F (or nothing or T if they're so inclined). I thought a relationship and enumeration entity was overkill, especially since that still only allows for a cumbersome drop-down menu. That's not very simple to use for such a binary attribute (my gender studies professors would probably want a many-to-many gendered relationship, and so would chastise me for being such a structuralist).

Cheers,

benjamin in chicago
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: OGNL and Wonder
      • From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>
References: 
 >OGNL and Wonder (From: James Cicenia <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: valueForKey for Relationship?
  • Next by Date: Re: OT: Java Based TEXTAREA -> HTML Library
  • Previous by thread: OGNL and Wonder
  • Next by thread: Re: OGNL and Wonder
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread