• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: decoupling EOF
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: decoupling EOF


  • Subject: Re: decoupling EOF
  • From: Michael Engelhart <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:54:31 -0600

it's my understading that iTunes store is built with webobjects yet
the front end is a desktop application.  I don't think they used Cocoa
EOF but rather then some home brewed web services mechanism for
communcation. I guess it could be using WOF but it just got me
thinking that you may be able to build an application using a
different view/controller then WOF and just use EOF for persistence.
maybe a bad analogy.

Mike


On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:49:49 -0600, Jay Martin <email@hidden> wrote:
> OK, I'll bite: what does iTunes have to do with it? Just curious...
>
> jay
>
> On Mar 4, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Michael Engelhart wrote:
>
> > Hello -
> >
> > Is it possible and/or has anyone had experience with decoupling EOF
> > and using it solely as a persistance engine ala Hibernate, Cayenne or
> > any other frameworks out there?  I'm assuming it can since iTunes
> > clearly wasn't built with WOBuilder. :-)
> >
> > I've been doing a lot of Tapestry work lately and really really like
> > that framework for the front-end and have used Hibernate and Cayenne
> > with some success.   Cayenne is very similar but it's only at version
> > 1.1 and EOF has been around forever and is very reliable in my
> > experience.   Hibernate just doesn't feel right for lack of a better
> > technical reason for not liking it (other then the lazy initialization
> > hacks that I hate dealing with).
> >
> > I would think the best of both worlds would be a Tapestry view and EOF
> > for the model.  Tapestry has almost an identical feel to WOBuilder and
> > is integrated nicely into eclipse.
> >
> > Any thoughts/advice would be appreciated.
> >
> > BTW, i realize it would require a license to do this but we deploy on
> > OS X Server so that's a non-issue.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Mike
> >  _______________________________________________
> > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> > Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> > email@hidden
> >
> > This email sent to email@hidden
> >
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: decoupling EOF
      • From: PA <email@hidden>
References: 
 >decoupling EOF (From: Michael Engelhart <email@hidden>)
 >Re: decoupling EOF (From: Jay Martin <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: decoupling EOF
  • Next by Date: Re: decoupling EOF
  • Previous by thread: Re: decoupling EOF
  • Next by thread: Re: decoupling EOF
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread