• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Packaging webobjects apps and frameworks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Packaging webobjects apps and frameworks


  • Subject: Re: Packaging webobjects apps and frameworks
  • From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 17:57:58 +0200

On the other hand, as I am just exploring on the subject, I see some pretty unpleasant behavior of XCode + friends on this. It is if WOBuilder has a preference to look into the EOModel when determining attributes of an eo, over looking into a packed class. And does NOT do it when one uses only the default package.

To overcome this one has to declare all the keys of the component with full package path, if one wants to see his custom methods or variables or whatever in WO Builder.

In contrast to this, all the methods are accessible even when the key is declared just with the class name. Just not displayed to be available.

I think it is not handy at all. Not to mention all the bah bah stuff that comes with packing Application and Session classes...

But then again I am a complete novice to it, so maybe after a while it will not seem like such a pain.

Cheers
F

On May 23, 2005, at 15:18, Anjo Krank wrote:

This is pretty bad practice and will almost certainly break in JDK 1.5.

Cheers, Anjo

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Packaging webobjects apps and frameworks (From: 時期 精霊 <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Packaging webobjects apps and frameworks (From: Robert Walker <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Packaging webobjects apps and frameworks (From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Active Directory
  • Next by Date: categories porting
  • Previous by thread: Re: Packaging webobjects apps and frameworks
  • Next by thread: porting methodology
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread