Re: new/update form patterns
Re: new/update form patterns
- Subject: Re: new/update form patterns
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 16:05:25 -0400
Yeah, I can definitely switch to one or the other w/ eogen, I'm just
kind of curious if the community-at-large agrees on what is "right".
Begin religious debate .......... NOW.
On May 26, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Kaj Hejer wrote:
On 26. mai 2005, at 21.52, Mike Schrag wrote:
While I'm soliciting methodologies, I'm curious how many of you
use the ObjC/WO naming for accessor methods vs the JavaBeans
convention (i.e. do you use "name()" or "getName()"). WO has made
me very schizophrenic wrt my get method naming. I feel urges to
name them like WO/ObjC now and I don't know who is on the dark
side in this battle :) The ObjC-style has definitely grown on me,
though.
about naming... if you use eogenerator it is easy to get setName/
getName methods in your eo-classes.
See http://www.rubicode.com/Software/EOGenerator/ for more info.
-Kaj :)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden