• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one


  • Subject: Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one
  • From: Arturo Perez <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:28:43 -0400

DevReseune wrote:
It's not a real one-to-one as in Hibernate. EOF thinks that for one side, the related object has to exist. In my application, all entities can exist without the others. EOF can't do that. Is it true?

Optional one-to-one? Mandatory one-to-one? You're not saying that Hibernate allows a mandatory one-to-one relationship to exist where one of the mandatory entities doesn't exist, are you?


EOF used to be weird about optional one-to-ones.  Dunno if it still is...

-arturo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Empty relationship that isn't null (From: DevReseune <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Empty relationship that isn't null (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Empty relationship that isn't null (From: DevReseune <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Empty relationship that isn't null (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Empty relationship that isn't null (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Empty relationship that isn't null (From: DevReseune <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Empty relationship that isn't null (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one (From: DevReseune <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one (From: DevReseune <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one
  • Next by Date: Re: porting methodology
  • Previous by thread: Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one
  • Next by thread: JavaMail in WO
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread