Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one
Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one
- Subject: Re: Empty relationship that isn't null >> problem with one-to-one
- From: Arturo Perez <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:28:43 -0400
DevReseune wrote:
It's not a real one-to-one as in Hibernate. EOF thinks that for one
side, the related object has to exist. In my application, all entities
can exist without the others. EOF can't do that. Is it true?
Optional one-to-one? Mandatory one-to-one? You're not saying that
Hibernate allows a mandatory one-to-one relationship to exist where one
of the mandatory entities doesn't exist, are you?
EOF used to be weird about optional one-to-ones. Dunno if it still is...
-arturo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden