• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
WO vs. 4D
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

WO vs. 4D


  • Subject: WO vs. 4D
  • From: Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:36:18 -0700

Dear WO Lists,

We need to know why WO is a much better solution than 4D for developing/deploying web-based applications. Since we are a pure WO shop and have no experience with 4D, it would be nice to get some insights from those that do have some experience with 4D as well as WO - for a fair comparison. We are proposing WO to an all mac-based client who is currently using 4D. They, however, prefer to web-enable their applications - still - using 4D. WO is always known to be faster, better, and more cost-effective; but we need to convince them why.

Thank you for your information.


With Kind Regards,

Dennis Gaastra, M.B.A.[sfu.ca], B.Sc.[ubc.ca]
Chief Technology Officer,

WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc.
HQ:  (+1) 604.921.1333
Fax:  (+1) 604.921.4313
Cell:  (+1) 604.787.2532
Email: email@hidden
Web: www.webappz.com & www.1tracker.com
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WO vs. 4D
      • From: Marek Wawrzyczny <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: shtml on WO 5.3
  • Next by Date: WebObjects 5.3 Tiger_10.4.2 XCode 2.1 Error On Query
  • Previous by thread: Re: shtml on WO 5.3
  • Next by thread: Re: WO vs. 4D
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread