Re: URGENT issues with CLOSE_WAIT states
Re: URGENT issues with CLOSE_WAIT states
- Subject: Re: URGENT issues with CLOSE_WAIT states
- From: Wolfram Stebel <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:37:09 +0200
- Thread-topic: URGENT issues with CLOSE_WAIT states
Am 03.04.2006 2:03 Uhr schrieb "Corin Lawson" unter
<email@hidden>:
> Thanks for the response... What major headache that bug is. I shall
> upgrade rather than coming up with a creative workaround (I'd love
> to, but I need a proper fix).
>
> I would like to know what kinds of limits there are for load on WO.
> How many instances of an application could I run, has anyone much
> experience with high loads, say 1000's of requests in the space of a
> few minutes? Java Monitor seems cumbersome with 100 instances.
>
> Cheers, Corin.
Hi Corin,
this has been discussed on the list some weeks ago.
100 instances seems to be too much at all.
As far as i remember, Chuck recommended something like running as few as
possible, adding instances if load is heavy, as long as the server can
handle the number of instances.
Instances need some (a lot) of RAM so you should understand that the number
of instances should be finite :-) (match your server outfit).
HTH
Wolfram
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden